Replacing Water Buffalo

Is a small, simple tractor a sustainable replacement for draft animals?

Background: Large loss of Water Buffalo (and other draft animals?) during Nargis makes it very difficult to cultivate rice paddies.

Issues:
-Logistics
-Training
-Support/Mechanics
-Cost

How do Water Buffalo fit into entire system?
-Do they supply food items?
-Do they provide fertilizer?
-Other cultural/economic/environmental impacts?
-Are draft animals easier to sustain?

Do we have contact with local people on the ground to asses direct and indirect impacts and/or define requirements?

Comments

Hey, guys. I'm looking for

Hey, guys. I'm looking for any information about xxx vids. Please let me know what ideas d'u have about this stuff.

Comrade.

Fossil fuel in Agriculture - missing link

Michael Pollan article is at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/magazine/12policy-t.html

Darn this brackets "<" & ">"

Fossil fuel in Agriculture

Lin,

Given that the long term goal, as so aptly described by Michael Pollan, See

is to reduce as far as possible the use of fossil fuels in the food cycle, I urge us to think out side the box with respect to introducing diesel tractors.

Will we be introducing a solution that ties the food economy to fossil fuels? Will the introduction of tractors form a barrier to restoring the ox population? What might be the unintended consequences. Will diesel tractors impose a diesel import tax that the villagers can not afford? We know that the less develop landscape is littered with abandoned diesel gen sets incapacitated by water added to 50 gallon drums of diesel fuel to cover up pilferage along the distribution chain. Just who will pay for, and deliver, the diesel without imposing a new cash burden on the villagers? I bet most of the villagers live in a cash flow economy on about $1 per day. Can they afford more than a liter of fuel at a time?

Clearly we want to avoid mass starvations and time is of the essence. However, how do we achieve our short term goals without sabotaging our long term strategic goals?

As for cooking, is there any way to use this unfortunate situation to move the population away from both charcoal and fossil fuels?

Regards,

Jock

Jock Gill
Pellet Futures
P.O. Box 3
Peacham, VT 05862
Live Green & Thrive!
O: +1 (781) 396-0492
C: +1 (617) 449-8111
VT: (802) 613-1444

Broader Considerations when Intervening in Myanmar

I concur with Jock. It would be a mistake to promote outside technological solutions that are not cost effective, when other more cost effective sustainable approaches are available. That said, given the severe depletion of beasts of burden (e.g., water buffalo) in Myanmar, small tractors customized for rice paddy use may be essential to rapidly recapture food productivity in Myanmar sufficient to feed the Burmese people. One of the concerns we should seriously consider is whether the development of a system for using tractors, or other interventions, makes the Burmese agricultural workers even more dependent upon the Myanmar junta in ways that further diminish their quality of life and functional life capacity over the longer term.

Bamboos huts and water buffalo, grown locally and traded through local market approaches does not increase dependency on government, which they do not participate in choosing. However, it also does nothing to give them leverage in their greater self-determination, when a government that does not represent them keeps them from owning land and may require them forcibly to move and engage in labor without the agricultural worker necessarily benefiting from the fruits of their labor. These are hard realities about Myanmar that must be faced over the longer term. But the first task have to be about creating resilience and sustainability now for millions of Burmese that are now at risk of malnutrition and possible starvation in the short-term.

We need to have a clear and comprehensive assessment of how many people are at risk of malnutrition and starvation before food production in Myanmar can meet their food and nutritional needs. We need to have clear and unbiased evidence regarding the viable agricultural capacities that are now laying fallow. When possible, water buffalos owned and controlled by Resilience Networks, organized at the village level are better than a tractor, that is owned by the Junta and requires outside input of fuel and maintenance. However, if tractors are necessary to kick start the agricultural production process to quickly build agricultural production, then a system must be devised for engaging them without creating long-term, counter-productive dependencies.

Keep in mind, the loss of beasts of burden are only one part of the problem. We need to test soil throughout the lower Irrawaddy Delta for salinity, given that there are reports of crop failure due to saltification. Loss of human labor is a problem. Not only have 140,000 been killed in the early stages of the Cyclone Nargis disaster: Countless others are inhibited by malnutrition, psychosocial problems, and socio-ecological gaps that diminish valuable contribution.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.